"Wrong," declares vanden Heuvel.
In her most recent article for the Washington Post, vanden Heuvel argues that new right-wing representatives will have extraordinary power, and progressives should uncompromisingly reinforce their stance.
The first half of her article appeals to her audience of progressives, and she uses a simple formula. A Democrat (for example, Barney Frank, chairman of the Financial House Services Committee) has had positive accomplishments (a financial reform), but a Republican replacement (Spencer Bachus) has negative plans (a government shutdown to stop this bill). Readers should have no trouble understanding that the new majority in the House disturbs vanden Heuvel.
Then, she takes it a step further: while the Democrats fight this battle, they shouldn't be a in a compromising mood like several "Blue Dogs" are. That's far out, dude, especially since Obama himself intends to cooperate with the new Congressmen. But her reasoning is compelling. If Democrats don't fight for what they stand for, their plans will disappointingly fall apart before their eyes. What's important now is to unify -- and if we can get the support of the president, then all the better.

All right, so what happens if the Democrats don't fight back and accept cooperation? They will watch their agenda "for which they fought -- and lost -- steadily erode." In saying this, vanden Heuvel effectively warns of a defeat that will be dangerous, slow, and painful. Let's sum it all up, then. If the Democrats don't do anything, they'll be sliced in two with a sword; if the Democrats compromise, they'll suffer a torturous death. Neither one of these options seems too appealing -- but in the sense that vanden Heuvel is trying to get progressives to take action, it's extremely appealing.

So look out, President Obama! "I mean, 'look out' in a fun way! Not like I'm gonna hurt you" (Andy Bernard, The Office).